HOKA Clifton 10 vs ASICS GEL-NIMBUS 27

Quick Answer

Choose the HOKA Clifton 10 when you want a lighter cushioned shoe that can move comfortably between easy running, walking, travel and everyday wear.

Choose the ASICS GEL-NIMBUS 27 when your priority is maximum neutral cushioning for long easy runs, stronger wet-road traction, a more breathable upper and a broader, more planted running platform.

Neither shoe is designed primarily for fast intervals, racing or technical trails.

Comparison Verdict

Olive Branch Comparison Scores

The 0.1-point difference is not large enough to make the ASICS automatically better for every buyer. Intended use and fit matter more than the overall numerical difference.

Product Positioning

The Clifton 10 and GEL-NIMBUS 27 are both neutral, highly cushioned road shoes, but they approach comfort differently.

HOKA positions the Clifton 10 for everyday running and walking. It uses a compression-molded EVA midsole, Smooth MetaRocker geometry, rearfoot-focused Active Foot Frame construction and a jacquard-knit upper. HOKA officially lists the men’s reference version at approximately 277.8 g with an 8 mm drop.

ASICS positions the GEL-NIMBUS 27 as a premium neutral cushioned trainer for long, comfortable running. It combines FF BLAST PLUS ECO foam, rearfoot PureGEL, an engineered jacquard mesh upper and a HYBRID ASICSGRIP outsole. ASICS lists the men’s reference version at 305 g and the women’s version at 265 g.

The practical difference is:

Clifton 10 prioritizes lighter everyday versatility.

GEL-NIMBUS 27 prioritizes protection, road grip and long-run comfort.

Model-Generation Note

This comparison evaluates the exact Clifton 10 and GEL-NIMBUS 27 models.

Both now have newer generations available in some markets. HOKA currently lists the Clifton 11, while ASICS currently lists the GEL-NIMBUS 28. Buyers should therefore compare the remaining-stock price of these two older models with the price of their replacements before purchasing.

A previous-generation model is not automatically poor value. It becomes attractive when:

• The discount is meaningful;
• The required size and width remain available;
• The return policy is acceptable;
• The older fit works better for the buyer;
• The newer generation does not offer a major benefit for the intended use.

Key Specifications

Official specifications and independent laboratory measurements should not be merged into one figure. Shoe size, measurement points, manufacturing variation and testing method can produce different stack and drop results.

Weight and Agility

Winner: HOKA Clifton 10

Weight is one of the clearest differences.

HOKA officially lists the Clifton 10 at approximately 277.8 g, while ASICS lists the GEL-NIMBUS 27 at 305 g. Independent laboratory samples showed a similar difference: approximately 275 g for the Clifton and 299 g for the Nimbus.

The roughly 24–27 g difference is noticeable when:

• Increasing cadence;
• Running uphill;
• Changing pace;
• Wearing the shoe throughout the day;
• Combining running and walking;
• Packing footwear for travel.

The Nimbus does not necessarily feel excessively heavy during slow running because its platform and transition are designed around steady movement. It becomes less competitive when the user wants frequent acceleration or a lighter all-purpose shoe.

Editorial conclusion

Choose the Clifton 10 when lower weight and everyday versatility matter.

Choose the Nimbus 27 when additional mass is acceptable in exchange for more substantial cushioning and outsole performance.

Cushioning and Impact Protection

Overall Winner: ASICS GEL-NIMBUS 27

Both products deliver high levels of impact protection, but the evidence differs between heel and forefoot performance.

RunRepeat measured the Clifton 10 at up to 147 SA of shock absorption in its tested sample. That result supports the shoe’s substantial heel cushioning and marks a major increase from the previous Clifton generation.

The same laboratory measured the GEL-NIMBUS 27 at 136 SA in both the heel and forefoot. The equal heel and forefoot result gives the Nimbus a more consistently documented full-foot cushioning profile, particularly for midfoot and forefoot strikers.

Therefore:

• Clifton 10 has the stronger cited heel shock-absorption result.
• Nimbus 27 has the stronger evidence for balanced heel-and-forefoot protection.

The Nimbus also has a higher measured forefoot stack: 34.4 mm compared with 32.0 mm for the Clifton sample. The Clifton measured slightly higher at the heel, at 44.4 mm compared with 42.7 mm.

Choose Clifton 10 for cushioning when:

• You are mainly a heel striker;
• You want protection without the full Nimbus weight;
• You divide use between running and walking;
• You prefer HOKA’s rocker transition.

Choose GEL-NIMBUS 27 for cushioning when:

• You want substantial cushioning under the whole foot;
• You run long, slow distances;
• You land at the midfoot or forefoot;
• You prioritize protection over ground feel.

Energy Return and Faster Running

Slight Winner: HOKA Clifton 10, but neither is a speed shoe

Laboratory testing measured heel energy return at approximately 52.3% for the Clifton 10 and 47.7% for the GEL-NIMBUS 27. Both results were below the comparison average used in those tests.

This means the Clifton has a modest numerical advantage, but it should not be interpreted as a highly responsive performance trainer.

Independent reviewers generally characterize the Clifton as smooth, protective and dependable rather than exciting. Believe in the Run found it effective for cushioned daily miles but not especially lively, while Doctors of Running described it as a firmly rockered workhorse with less versatility for faster running.

The Nimbus also performs best at controlled speeds. Independent reviewers describe it as stable and smooth but large, blocky and relatively heavy, with more emphasis on steady mileage than aggressive pace changes.

Editorial conclusion

For occasional moderate pace increases, the Clifton 10 has a small advantage.

For tempo sessions, intervals and racing, neither is the strongest option. The ASICS NOVABLAST 5 from the Gold Review group is a more appropriate multi-pace trainer.

Ride and Transition

Clifton 10: Rockered and forward-rolling

The Clifton uses HOKA’s Smooth MetaRocker geometry. The combination of a high heel, curved sole and rearfoot-focused structure encourages a rolling transition rather than a flexible, ground-connected movement.

Doctors of Running described the Clifton 10 as protective, firmly rockered and suitable for logging large volumes of daily mileage. The increased drop gives the shoe a more pronounced forward transition than earlier Clifton versions.

GEL-NIMBUS 27: Broader and more controlled

The Nimbus uses a high, broad platform with a heel bevel and relatively stiff forefoot. Doctors of Running described it as a balanced, slightly firmer high-stack trainer that works well for long and steady efforts.

The Nimbus transition feels less distinctly rockered than the HOKA. It is better described as controlled and stable, with the shoe’s size and stiffness becoming more noticeable at slower walking speeds or during rapid pace changes.

Winner by preference

• Choose Clifton 10 for a stronger rocker sensation.
• Choose Nimbus 27 for a broad and controlled running platform.
• Choose neither when you want high forefoot flexibility and ground feel.

Stability

Slight Winner: ASICS GEL-NIMBUS 27

Both products are officially neutral shoes, but both provide more inherent stability than many soft neutral trainers.

The Clifton gains stability from high midsole sidewalls, a broad midfoot, substantial torsional rigidity and a relatively wide base. RunRepeat measured its forefoot platform at 116.9 mm and heel platform at approximately 94.5 mm.

The GEL-NIMBUS 27 has an even broader measured platform: approximately 119.5 mm in the forefoot and 99.8 mm at the heel. It also received high torsional-rigidity and heel-counter measurements in the same laboratory assessment.

Doctors of Running classified both as stable-neutral shoes. The Nimbus benefits from its broad sole, sidewalls, sole flare and stiffer construction, while the Clifton combines sidewalls, a firmer ride and a wide midfoot.

Important distinction

Neither model uses the dedicated 4D Guidance System found in the ASICS GEL-KAYANO 31.

A stable-neutral platform should not be presented as:

• A treatment for overpronation;
• A medical device;
• Proof of injury prevention;
• A universal solution for foot or knee pain.

Editorial conclusion

The Nimbus feels more planted and substantial.

The Clifton feels somewhat less bulky and easier to use outside running.

Fit and Toe-Box Space

Result: Close to a tie

Independent laboratory measurements found very similar overall internal widths.

The Clifton offers slightly more vertical toe space in the cited sample, while the Nimbus offers slightly more width near the big toe. The differences are small and should not be treated as guarantees for every size.

Independent reviewers generally found:

Clifton 10

• More accommodating than earlier Clifton versions;
• Secure through the heel;
• Normal to slightly snug through parts of the forefoot;
• Comfortable after an initial break-in period.

GEL-NIMBUS 27

• Secure through the midfoot;
• Highly padded at the heel;
• More forefoot room than some earlier Nimbus versions;
• Best suited to normal-width and normal-volume feet in standard sizing.

Fit verdict

The correct winner depends on foot shape.

• Choose Clifton when additional vertical toe room matters.
• Choose Nimbus when heel padding and a secure upper matter.
• Use the wide version when necessary instead of assuming the broad outsole equals a broad internal fit.

Breathability

Winner: ASICS GEL-NIMBUS 27

RunRepeat awarded the Clifton 10 a breathability result of 3 out of 5. The upper was considered durable and comfort-focused, but not ideal for particularly hot conditions.

The GEL-NIMBUS 27 received 4 out of 5 in the same type of test. Its engineered jacquard mesh provided stronger measured airflow despite substantial padding around the heel.

This gives the Nimbus an advantage for:

• Warm-weather long runs;
• High-volume training;
• Users whose feet overheat easily;
• Longer continuous running sessions.

Breathability still depends on socks, climate, colorway, pace and individual heat tolerance.

Wet-Road Grip

Clear Winner: ASICS GEL-NIMBUS 27

This is the largest measurable performance difference in the comparison.

RunRepeat recorded a forefoot-traction result of 0.84 for the GEL-NIMBUS 27, compared with 0.49 for the Clifton 10. The Clifton result represented a clear improvement from the Clifton 9, but the Nimbus remained substantially stronger in the cited test.

ASICS uses a HYBRID ASICSGRIP outsole combining ASICSGRIP and AHARPLUS rubber. The construction is intended to balance traction and durability on road surfaces.

Choose Nimbus 27 when:

• You regularly run in rain;
• Wet-road confidence matters;
• Your routes include smooth pavement;
• You want stronger measurable outsole grip.

Choose Clifton 10 when:

• Most use is on ordinary dry roads;
• Walking and daily flexibility matter more;
• The Clifton is significantly cheaper;
• Wet-condition performance is secondary.

Neither outsole should be treated as a replacement for a technical trail shoe.

Flexibility, Walking and Everyday Wear

Winner: HOKA Clifton 10

Although the Clifton has high torsional rigidity, its forward-bending flexibility was measured at approximately 14.7 N, close to the test-database average. The same review regarded it as suitable for walking, casual use and travel.

The GEL-NIMBUS 27 required approximately 20.2 N in the cited bending test, making it noticeably stiffer. RunRepeat concluded that the stiffness reduced its casual-walking appeal compared with more flexible shoes.

The Clifton is also lighter by approximately 24–27 g, depending on whether official or laboratory measurements are compared.

Clifton 10 is better for:

• Running and walking in the same shoe;
• City travel;
• Casual daily use;
• Long periods of mixed movement;
• Buyers who do not want a highly specialized running-only feel.

Nimbus 27 is better for:

• Continuous easy running;
• Recovery mileage;
• Long controlled road sessions;
• Users who prefer a structured shoe while walking.

Doctors of Running had a more favorable walking experience in the Nimbus than RunRepeat, showing that walking comfort remains individual.

Long Runs and Recovery Runs

Winner: ASICS GEL-NIMBUS 27

The GEL-NIMBUS 27’s strongest use case is sustained, controlled mileage.

Its advantages include:

• High forefoot and heel stack;
• Equal measured shock absorption in the heel and forefoot;
• Broad stable-neutral platform;
• Strong road traction;
• Breathable upper;
• Secure heel padding.

ASICS introduced the model specifically as a cushioned neutral shoe for longer, comfortable running, while independent reviewers consistently identified daily training and long steady mileage as its main purpose.

The Clifton can also handle long runs. Independent reviewers praised its protection, stable-neutral geometry and ability to absorb large volumes of daily mileage. Its advantage is that it weighs less and transitions more naturally into walking or casual use.

Long-run decision

Choose the Nimbus when long running is the main activity.

Choose the Clifton when the shoe will also be used extensively before and after the run.

Community Feedback Differences

The following table summarizes recurring public-feedback patterns identified during the two Gold Reviews. These are thematic observations, not statistical survey results.

The community evidence should not be used to claim that a fixed percentage of customers prefers one model.

Category Scorecard

These are Olive Branch editorial comparison scores, not manufacturer or laboratory ratings.

The overall result is close because the Clifton gains meaningful points for weight, walking and general-purpose use.

Choose the HOKA Clifton 10 If

Choose the Clifton 10 when:

• You divide your time between running and walking;
• You want the lighter of the two shoes;
• You prefer a pronounced rocker transition;
• You want high heel protection without the full Nimbus weight;
• Travel and casual use matter;
• You occasionally increase pace but do not need a speed shoe;
• The Clifton is meaningfully discounted;
• You find the Nimbus too heavy or stiff.

Main Clifton Compromise

The conventional CMEVA midsole provides protection but relatively modest energy return, while the outsole has weaker measured wet grip than the Nimbus.

Choose the ASICS GEL-NIMBUS 27 If

Choose the GEL-NIMBUS 27 when:

• Long easy runs are the primary use;
• You want maximum neutral cushioning;
• Forefoot cushioning matters;
• Wet-road traction is important;
• You prefer a broad and planted platform;
• You value a more breathable upper;
• Weight is less important than protection;
• The GEL-NIMBUS 27 is substantially cheaper than the GEL-NIMBUS 28.

Main Nimbus Compromise

The Nimbus is heavier, stiffer and less convenient for mixed casual use. It also has low measured energy return for a premium trainer.

Neither Is Ideal If

Neither shoe is the strongest choice when you want:

• A lightweight tempo trainer;
• A carbon-plated race shoe;
• Technical-trail traction;
• Strong ground feel;
• A minimalist platform;
• Dedicated corrective stability;
• A highly flexible casual shoe;
• A product selected specifically to treat pain or injury.

For dedicated stability, compare the ASICS GEL-KAYANO 31.

For higher pace versatility, compare the ASICS NOVABLAST 5.

For maximum walking and standing emphasis, compare the HOKA Bondi 9.

Price and Value Decision

The original reference prices placed the Clifton 10 at approximately $150 and the GEL-NIMBUS 27 around $160–165, depending on the cited market and retailer.

Because both products have newer generations, current selling price matters more than launch price.

Use the following rule:

• When the Clifton costs substantially less, it offers stronger mixed-use value.
• When prices are similar and running is the main purpose, the Nimbus offers stronger overall evidence.
• When either older model is close to the price of its replacement, compare the newer generation first.
• Do not rank value without recording region, retailer and verification date.

Recommended page display:

Price region: United States
Price last checked: August 1, 2026
Actual price may vary by size, width, color and retailer.

Final Verdict

The ASICS GEL-NIMBUS 27 is the better choice for runners seeking a highly protective shoe for easy, recovery and long-distance road running.

It wins on:

• Full-foot cushioning;
• Wet-road traction;
• Breathability;
• Broad-platform stability;
• Long-run specialization.

The HOKA Clifton 10 is the better choice for buyers seeking a lighter shoe that can move between easy running, walking, travel and everyday use.

It wins on:

• Weight;
• General-purpose versatility;
• Walking flexibility;
• Rocker-based transitions;
• Potential previous-generation value.

Final Selection

Choose GEL-NIMBUS 27 for long, easy and recovery-focused running.
Choose Clifton 10 for mixed running, walking, travel and everyday comfort.
Choose neither for racing, technical trails or dedicated speed training.

Olive Branch Comparison Winner for Running: ASICS GEL-NIMBUS 27

Olive Branch Comparison Winner for Mixed Use: HOKA Clifton 10

Sources & Research Notes

Official Product Sources

1. HOKA — Clifton 10 Official Product Page
   Used to verify product identity, intended use, official weight, drop, midsole, upper, rocker and outsole construction.
2. ASICS — GEL-NIMBUS 27 Official Launch Information
   Used to verify product positioning, official weight, cushioning system, upper, outsole and launch-price reference.
3. HOKA — Clifton 11 Official Product Page
   Used only to verify that a newer Clifton generation is available in the cited market.
4. ASICS — GEL-NIMBUS 28 Official Product Page
   Used only to verify that a newer Nimbus generation is available in the cited market.

Independent Laboratory Sources

5. RunRepeat — HOKA Clifton 10 Laboratory Review
   Used for independent weight, stack, drop, shock absorption, energy return, fit, grip, flexibility, stability and durability measurements.
6. RunRepeat — ASICS GEL-NIMBUS 27 Laboratory Review
   Used for independent weight, stack, drop, shock absorption, energy return, fit, traction, flexibility and breathability measurements.

Independent Hands-On Review Sources

7. Doctors of Running — HOKA Clifton 10 Review
   Used for ride, fit, stable-neutral classification, intended use and long-run observations.
8. Doctors of Running — ASICS GEL-NIMBUS 27 Review
   Used for ride, fit, stable-neutral classification, long-run suitability and value observations.
9. Believe in the Run — HOKA Clifton 10 Review
   Used for comfort, daily-training, fit, weight and responsiveness observations.
10. Believe in the Run — ASICS GEL-NIMBUS 27 Review
    Used for upper comfort, weight, ride character and daily-training observations.

Research Disclosure

Laboratory results represent specific tested samples and should not be treated as guaranteed measurements for every shoe size or production batch.

Fit, comfort, stability and performance vary according to individual anatomy, running mechanics, size, width, pace and surface.