Quick answer
The ASICS Philippines listing describes adaptive stability guidance for GEL-KAYANO 31. The GEL-NIMBUS 27 has a cushioning-focused product description and is classified as neutral by RunRepeat; in RunRepeat’s sample, it also had more measured heel/forefoot stack and shock absorption. Those findings describe product documentation and one independent lab’s samples. Olive Branch did not wear-test, measure or assess either shoe, and this comparison cannot determine an individual runner’s gait, comfort or medical needs.
Models and market checked
This comparison covers the men’s GEL-KAYANO 31 ASICS Philippines listing and GEL-NIMBUS 27 ASICS Philippines listing. The Kayano listing identifies style 1011B867-302, Pure Aqua/Pure Silver, standard (D) width; the Nimbus listing identifies style 1011B958-002, Black/Lake Grey, standard (D) width. The pages are evidence for those listed versions and this market, not every color, size, width or regional variant.
What ASICS lists
The ASICS Philippines Kayano listing describes the GEL-KAYANO 31 4D GUIDANCE SYSTEM as helping provide adaptive stability and a more balanced stride during distance training. Its listing also names FF BLAST PLUS ECO cushioning, rearfoot PureGEL, an engineered mesh upper and a HYBRID ASICSGRIP outsole.
The ASICS Philippines Nimbus listing describes soft cushioning for a smoother running experience. It names FF BLAST PLUS ECO, PureGEL, an engineered jacquard mesh upper and HYBRID ASICSGRIP. RunRepeat classifies its reviewed GEL-NIMBUS 27 as neutral. These are descriptions of the cited sources; they do not establish which support style is suitable for a particular person.
RunRepeat laboratory measurements
RunRepeat’s GEL-KAYANO 31 review and GEL-NIMBUS 27 review report the following results for their respective samples. Its pages do not establish that the two shoes were the same size or a matched pair. Read these as measurements from that lab’s procedures, not measurements by Olive Branch or guarantees for every production shoe.
| Measurement | GEL-KAYANO 31 | GEL-NIMBUS 27 |
|---|---|---|
| Sample weight | 295 g | 299 g |
| Measured heel / forefoot stack | 39.3 / 27.8 mm | 42.7 / 34.4 mm |
| Heel / forefoot shock absorption | 131 / 110 SA | 136 / 136 SA |
| Measured heel-to-toe drop | 11.5 mm (brand reference shown by RunRepeat: 10 mm) | 8.3 mm (brand reference shown by RunRepeat: 8 mm) |
| Forefoot traction result | 0.83 | 0.84 |
| Flexibility test force | 15.8 N | 20.2 N |
In this sample, the Nimbus had greater measured stack and shock absorption at both ends of the shoe. The Kayano’s measured forefoot stack and shock-absorption values were lower, while its 4D GUIDANCE SYSTEM is the distinguishing manufacturer-listed support feature. The 0.83 and 0.84 traction results are very close; they should not be treated as a meaningful real-world difference or as a wet-road safety guarantee. RunRepeat’s measured drop values also differ from the brand-reference figures presented on its pages, so keep each basis separate.
Philippines price snapshot
When checked on September 30, 2026, the ASICS Philippines GEL-KAYANO 31 listing displayed a list price of ₱11,090 and a sale price of ₱6,654 for style 1011B867-302; the GEL-NIMBUS 27 listing displayed ₱10,990 / ₱6,594 for style 1011B958-002. These are time-sensitive page snapshots for the specific men’s color and standard-width listings above. Prices, discounts and size selection can change; this is not a price guarantee or an availability claim.
How to choose between them
- Consider the GEL-KAYANO 31 if the manufacturer-described adaptive guidance is a feature you are intentionally looking for. The source does not establish that you need stability support.
- Consider the GEL-NIMBUS 27 if you prefer its cushioning-focused design and the sample measurements reported by RunRepeat are relevant to your comparison. Lab measurements do not predict your comfort or fit.
- Check the exact size, width, color, current price, stock and return terms on the seller’s page before buying.
- Neither this comparison nor the linked product pages diagnose overpronation, pain or injury, or show that either shoe prevents or treats a condition.
For how Olive Branch separates manufacturer statements, independent measurements and editorial conclusions, see the Review Methodology. Related comparisons: HOKA Clifton 10 vs GEL-NIMBUS 27 and HOKA Bondi 9 vs GEL-NIMBUS 27. Browse more at the Comparisons archive.
Sources and disclosure
- ASICS Philippines — GEL-KAYANO 31, men’s style 1011B867-302 (listed product details and checked price snapshot).
- ASICS Philippines — GEL-NIMBUS 27, men’s style 1011B958-002 (listed product details and checked price snapshot).
- RunRepeat — ASICS GEL-KAYANO 31 laboratory review (reported sample measurements and test results).
- RunRepeat — ASICS GEL-NIMBUS 27 laboratory review (reported sample measurements and test results).
Source pages checked September 30, 2026. Olive Branch did not conduct wear tests, laboratory tests, gait analysis or a medical assessment for this comparison. Fit, comfort, availability and individual suitability remain unverified. See the Review Methodology for how product claims are sourced. A dedicated reader-contact or correction route has not been verified.
Leave a Reply